Analysis Distribution and Affordability of Educational Field Practices Geography Education Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/jlils.v4i2.112Keywords:
Educational Field Practices, distribution, affordabilityAbstract
This research aims to analyze the distribution and accessibility of educational field practice (PLK) locations as places where teaching by Geography Education Field Practice students in Padang City. The method used in this research is the euclidean distance method to estimate and reflect the direct distance between the locations of schools by measuring the distance to school points (maximum and minimum) which tend to be the goals of PLK activities in Padang City from 2021 to 2023. Analysis carried out carried out divided into sub-district areas in Padang City. The results of analysis distribution of PLK location selection are spread across several schools in eleven sub-districts. The affordability of location shows that there are differences in the geographical distribution of educational field practice schools in Padang City. Distribution of maximum and minimum distance variations between schools and between different sub-districts through analysis with the help of the Geography Information System. The results of the affordability analysis explain that there is a difference between the maximum and minimum distance between schools and the number of students who choose teaching practice locations from the outermost area of the sub-district. Where areas closer to school points are an option for prospective PLK students.
References
Andersson, F., Haltiwanger, J. C., Kutzbach, M. J., Pollakowski, H. O., & Weinberg, D. H. (2018). Job displacement and the duration of joblessness: The role of spatial mismatch. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(2). https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00707
Berthold, M. R., & Höppner, F. (2016). On Clustering Time Series Using Euclidean Distance and Pearson Correlation. http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.02213
Boyle, A., Maguire, S., Martin, A., Milsom, C., Nash, R., Rawlinson, S., Turner, A., Wurthmann, S., & Conchie, S. (2007). Fieldwork is good: The student perception and the affective domain. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260601063628
Cook, V. (2010). Exploring students’ personal experiences of geography fieldwork. Teaching Geography, 35(2).
France, D., & Haigh, M. (2018). Fieldwork@40: fieldwork in geography higher education. Journal of Geography in Higher
Education, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1515187
Fuller, I., Edmondson, S., France, D., Higgitt, D., & Ratinen, I. (2006). International perspectives on the effectiveness of geography fieldwork for learning. In Journal of Geography in Higher Education (Vol. 30, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500499667
Huang, R., Cui, C., Sun, W., & Towey, D. (2020). Poster: Is Euclidean Distance the best Distance Measurement for Adaptive Random Testing? Proceedings - 2020 IEEE 13th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation, ICST 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST46399.2020.00049
Kent, M., Gilbertson, D. D., & Hunt, C. O. (1997). Fieldwork in geography teaching: A critical review of the literature and approaches. In Journal of Geography in Higher Education (Vol. 21, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1080/03098269708725439
Knowles, D., & Gao, G. (2023). Euclidean Distance Matrix-Based Rapid Fault Detection and Exclusion. Navigation, Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 70(1). https://doi.org/10.33012/NAVI.555
Larkin, H., & Watchorn, V. (2012). Changes and challenges in higher education: What is the impact on fieldwork education? Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 59(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12002
Liu, D., Mansour, H., Boufounos, P. T., & Kamilov, U. S. (2018). Robust sensor localization based on Euclidean distance matrix. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2018-July. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2018.8517324
Mann, B., & Saultz, A. (2019). The Role of Place, Geography, and Geographic Information Systems in Educational Research. AERA Open, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419869340
Mesquita, D. P. P., Gomes, J. P. P., Souza Junior, A. H., & Nobre, J. S. (2017). Euclidean distance estimation in incomplete datasets. Neurocomputing, 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.081
Rekha, R. S., Radhakrishnan, N., & Mathew, S. (2020). Spatial accessibility analysis of schools using geospatial techniques. Spatial Information Research, 28(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-020-00326-w
Stoyanova-Petrova, S. (2011). An Experience Using Performance-Centered Mobile Learning to Enhance Fieldwork Education. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (IJAC), 4(4), 43. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v4i4.1727
Vácha, Z., & Ditrich, T. (2021). Impact of fieldwork education on performing cognitive and affective objectives in pupils at primary schools. E-Pedagogium, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.5507/epd.2020.021
Wright R, H. K. (2019). 2 Challenges and Recommendations for Rural Field Education: A Review of the Social Work Literature.
Zahl-Thanem, A., & Rye, J. F. (2024). Spatial inequality in higher education: a growing urban–rural educational gap? European Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcae015
Zhang, L., Jia, Q., Liu, S., Ruan, L., & Long, Y. (2019). New patterns for geography field practice education based on location services. Abstracts of the ICA, 1. https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-1-432-2019
