Indonesian EFL Students’ Experiencies in Using Alef Education For Vocabulary Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/jlils.v5i1.144Keywords:
Game-based learning, Learning Motivation, Multimodal approach, Digital PlatformsAbstract
Mobile game-based learning presents a potential avenue for vocabulary acquisition in English language learning, yet research on students’ perceptions of specific platforms is limited. This study focuses on investigating Grade 9 students’ perceptions of using Alef Education, an AI-based digital platform, for English vocabulary learning in North Sumatra, Indonesia. The purpose is to explore how gamification and multimodal approaches affect learning motivation and vocabulary retention. Using a descriptive qualitative method with a phenomenological perspective, data were collected through participatory observation and semi-structured interviews with ten students aged 14–15. Findings reveal that gamified features significantly enhance motivation, and the multimodal approach combining text, audio, and visuals improves vocabulary retention and application. However, technical issues and limited teacher interaction hinder effectiveness. This study highlights the importance of addressing both motivational and practical barriers in digital platforms. These insights inform strategies to optimize game-based learning for vocabulary acquisition in EFL contexts.
References
Abujaja, A., & Abukari, A. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of the use of Alef Education platform in teaching. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 6(2), 89–98.
Alhebshi, S., & Gamlo, N. (2022). The impact of gamification on EFL students’ motivation and achievement. Arab World English Journal, 13(1), 356–372. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.24
Alyammahi, A., & De Oliveira, J. M. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of Alef Education platform in UAE schools. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(4), 232–241.
Al-Nasseri, A., & Al-Maamari, K. (2020). Teachers' perceptions of using Alef Education for vocabulary instruction. Advances in Computer and Online Education, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.221358
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Chen, C.-M., Lee, T.-H., & Chen, Y.-H. (2019). Improving EFL students’ learning motivation and outcomes through a mobile game-based English vocabulary learning approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 793–817.
Conderman, G., Hedin, L. R., & Bresnahan, V. (2013). Vocabulary instruction: What L2 can learn from L1. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 49(2), 62–67.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Eatough, V., & Smith, J. A. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 179–194). SAGE Publications.
Education. (2021). About Alef Education. https://www.alefeducation.com/
Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230.
Freiberg, H. J., & Stein, T. A. (1999). Measuring, improving, and sustaining healthy learning environments. In H. J. Freiberg (Ed.), School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments (pp. 11–29). Falmer Press.
Fraser, B. J. (1999). Using learning environment assessments to improve classroom and school climates. In H. J. Freiberg (Ed.), School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments (pp. 65–83). Falmer Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28(2), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916297X00103
Huizenga, J., Admiraal, W., Akkerman, S., & ten Dam, G. (2019). Mobile game-based learning in secondary education: Engagement, motivation and learning in a mobile city game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 347–358.
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
Ilmiani, S., Sudarsono, S., & Syarif, H. (2020). The use of mobile game-based learning to improve students’ vocabulary mastery. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials, 2(1), 1–10.
Klimova, B. (2021). Mobile phone use in English as a foreign language learning. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4131–4141.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000202
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications.
Muttaqiyyah, L. (2024). Vocabulary learning strategies used by students. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris, 1(1), pp. 44-49.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2014). A practical guide to using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in qualitative research psychology. Psychological Journal, 20(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7
Pikhart, M., & Klimova, B. (2021). Mobile technology and English language learning: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 11(4), 193.
Pintrich, P. R., Cross, D. R., Kozma, R. B., & McKeachie, W. J. (1986). Instructional psychology. Prentice-Hall.
Schwabe, G., & Göth, C. (2005). Mobile learning with a mobile game: Design and motivational effects. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 204–216.
Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 411–436.
Smith, J. A. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 39–54.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). SAGE Publications.
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. SAGE Publications.
Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Pearson Education.
Van Manen, M. (2016). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.
Zhang, H. (2018). Application of gamification in English vocabulary teaching. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 232, 100–104. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccese-18.2018.23
