Teacher Feedback and Wait-Time in Primary Science Classroom Dialogue: A TBLA Study

Authors

  • Dessy Norma Juita Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Venna Puspita Sari Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Laely Farokhah Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/jlils.v6i1.216

Keywords:

Classroom Dialogue, Teacher Feedback, Wait-time, Dialogic Teaching, TBLA

Abstract

This study explores how teacher feedback and wait-time shape the quality of classroom dialogue in primary science learning. Using a qualitative descriptive approach with Transcript-Based Lesson Analysis (TBLA), the study involved one sixth-grade science teacher and 19 students in an urban primary school in Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia. Data were collected through audio-visual recordings of three science lessons, classroom observations, and semi-structured interviews. The findings showed that accepted feedback was the most dominant type, mainly functioning to confirm students’ responses and maintain classroom flow. Modified feedback contributed more significantly to extending dialogue through probing questions and clarification prompts. Short wait-time tended to produce rapid and simple responses, whereas extended wait-time supported elaboration, reflection, and deeper reasoning. Furthermore, feedback and wait-time jointly contributed to the transformation of conventional IRF patterns into more dialogic IRFRF interaction sequences characterized by elaboration, reciprocity, reflection, and collaborative reasoning in primary science classroom discourse

References

Ali, S. (2025). The sound of learning in silence: Culturally responsive teaching for Chinese students in UK higher education. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2588835

Alexander, R. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion. Routledge.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Boye, A.B. & Mahmood, S. (2026). Between Control and Facilitation: The Implications of Teachers’ Discourse Choices on Learner Participation in ESL Classrooms. Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review, 4(2), 2969-2985. https://doi.org/10.63468/sshrr.380

Carpentier, G., Sirard, A., & Villeneuve-Lapointe, M. (2026). From control to facilitation: Analyzing instructional stance and distribution of classroom talk across elementary classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 10 (2026) 100572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2026.100572

Chen, Y. C., Hand, B. & Norton-Meier, L. (2017). Teacher Roles of Questioning in Early Elementary Science Classrooms: A Framework Promoting Student Cognitive Complexities in Argumentation. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 373–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9506-6

Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621100

Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171

Davis, K. S. (2003). “Change is hard”: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education (Salem, Mass.), 87(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10037

Fowler, T. W. (1975). An investigation of the teacher behavior of wait-time during an inquiry science lesson. ERIC, ED 108 872 in Alsaadi, N. S. M. & Atar, C. (2019). Wait-time in material and classroom context modes. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6(1), 53-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.542495

Hajar, M. U. (2019). Analisis pola dialog pembelajaran IPA menggunakan TBLA (Transcript Based Lesson Analysis) di salah satu SMP Kota Bandung (Master’s thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).

Harris, C. J., Wiebe, E., Grover, S., & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.). (2023). Classroom-based STEM assess-ment: Contemporary issues and perspectives. Community for Advancing Discovery Research in Edu-cation (CADRE). Education Development Center, Inc.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Ingram, J., & Elliott, V. (2015). Turn-taking and ‘wait-time’ in classroom interactions. Research Papers in Education, 31(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2014.983524

Lake, J. H. (1973). The influence of wait-time on the verbal dimensions of student inquiry behavior. In K. Tobin, and W. Capie (1983) The influence of wait‐time on classroom learning. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1): 35-48.

Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001

Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning-making in secondary science classrooms. Open University Press.

Prianggita, V. A., Hendayana, S., Jihaduddin, & Riswanto, D. (2022). Analisis proses pembelajaran melalui lesson study for learning community berbasis transcript-based learning analysis (TBLA). Kaffah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosio-Keagamaan, 1(1), 1–10.

Rahayu, D. S., Rahmawan, S., Hendayana, S., Muslim, M., & Sendi, S. (2020). Pattern of analysis students’ knowledge construction using transcript-based lesson analysis. In Proceedings of the 4th Asian Education Symposium (AES 2019) (pp. 140–144). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200513.031

Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait-time and rewards as instructional variables: Their influence on language, logic, and fate control. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660110202

Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait Time: Slowing Down May Be A Way of Speeding Up! Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487186037001

Skidmore, D., & Murakami, K. (Eds.). (2016). Dialogic pedagogy: The importance of dialogue in teaching and learning (Vol. 51). Multilingual Matters.

Szelei, N., Tinoca, L., & Pinho, A. S. (2020). Professional development for cultural diversity: The challenges of teacher learning in context. Professional Development in Education, 46(5), 780–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1642233

Tobin, K., & Capie, W. (1985). Relationships between teacher wait-time and student achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660220504

Vrikki, M., & Evagorou, M. (2023). An analysis of teacher questioning practices in dialogic lessons. International Journal of Educational Research, 117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102107

Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating Classroom Discourse. Routledge.

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.

Winarti, A., Iriani, R., Butakor, P. K., Meiliawati, R., & Syarpin, S. (2023). Transcript-based lesson analysis: The analysis of classroom communication in chemistry implementing case-based and project-based learning. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v6i1.22511

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

Norma Juita, D., Sari, V. P., & Farokhah, L. (2026). Teacher Feedback and Wait-Time in Primary Science Classroom Dialogue: A TBLA Study. Journal of Learning Improvement and Lesson Study, 6(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.24036/jlils.v6i1.216