Mapping Chemistry Learning Barriers in the Context of Islamic Higher Education: Insights from Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers

Authors

  • Anita Fibonacci Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Asep Kadarohman Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Hernani Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Roslinawati Mohd Roslan Universiti Brunei Darussalam
  • Apriliana Drastisianti Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/jlils.v5i2.171

Keywords:

Learning barriers, Pre-service chemistry teachers, Islamic higher education, thematic analysis

Abstract

is known about how these barriers are experienced within Islamic university contexts. This study investigates such barriers among pre-service chemistry teachers in an Islamic university background. Employing a qualitative case study design, 53 participants were purposively selected and provided data through open-ended questionnaires and in-depth interviews. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis with NVivo 12 support. The results indicated that organic chemistry was the course most frequently perceived as difficult according to Pre-Service Chemistry teachers (PCTs) in an Islamic University. Building on this finding, thematic analysis identified four main themes as underlying barriers to learning organic chemistry: (a) intrinsic content challenges, (b) high cognitive demands, (c) motivational barriers, and (d) lack of supportive learning tools and approaches. These results indicate that pre-service chemistry teachers’ barriers in learning chemistry are multifaceted, extending beyond content knowledge to include cognitive and affective dimensions as well as contextual limitations in Islamic higher education. The results provide insights for designing pedagogical strategies that infusing Islamic values in science leaning to lead inner motivation, and offer accessible learning tools such as tangible 3D molecular models and digital simulations to support deeper engagement for complex concepts like organic chemistry courses.

References

An-Najjar, Z. (2006). Pembuktian Sains dalam Sunnahi. Sinar Grafika Offset.

Barke, H.-D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. (2019). Misconception in Chemistry: Addressing Perception in Chemical Education. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Bhattacharya, P., & Basak, A. (2024). A Student-Friendly Approach to Introduce the Evolution of Planar Chirality. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(2), 392–397. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00680

Bongers, A., Beauvoir, B., Streja, N., Northoff, G., & Flynn, A. B. (2020). Building mental models of a reaction mechanism: The influence of static and animated representations, prior knowledge, and spatial ability. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(2), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00198k

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Qualitative Research in Psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Qualitative Research in Psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 57–71). https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004

Carlisle, D., Tyson, J., & Nieswandt, M. (2015). Fostering spatial skill acquisition by general chemistry students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(3), 478–517. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00228h

Casselman, M. D., Eichler, J. F., & Atit, K. (2021). Advancing multimedia learning for science : Comparing the effect of virtual versus physical models on student learning about stereochemistry. Science Education, November 2020, 1285–1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21675

Chasanah, I., & Mustaqim, A. (2023). Integrasi Teori Al-Jabiri dan Sains: Analisis Model Pembelajaran IPA Materi Perkembangbiakan Tumbuhan. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 3(3), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v3i3.2567

Cormier, C., & Voisard, B. (2018). Flipped classroom in Organic chemistry has significant effect on students ’ grades. Frontiers in ICT, 4(January), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00030

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. In Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design (3rd ed.). SAGE.

De Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0

Elford, D., Lancaster, S., & Jones, G. (2022). Exploring the Effect of Augmented Reality on Cognitive Load, Attitude, Spatial Ability, and Stereochemical Perception. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09957-0

Ellis, J. W. (1994). How Are We Going To Teach Organic: Some Observations of an Organic Professor. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(5), 399–403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/ed071p399

Fernandes, H. S., Cerqueira, N. M. F. S. A., & Sousa, S. F. (2021). Developing and Using BioSIMAR, an Augmented Reality Program to Visualize and Learn about Chemical Structures in a Virtual Environment on Any Internet-Connected Device. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(5), 1789–1794. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01317

Fernández, G. A., Ocampo, R. A., Costantino, A. R., & Dop, N. S. (2019). Application of Didactic Strategies as Multisensory Teaching Tools in Organic Chemistry Practices for Students with Visual Disabilities. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(4), 691–696. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00816

Fitriani, A. R., Rahmawati, A., & Lathifa, U. (2022). Phenomenology of Conceptual Understanding Ability, Representation, and Student Algorithm on Stoichiometry Materials. Journal of Educational Chemistry (JEC), 4(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.21580/jec.2022.4.1.9744

Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Introduction : Macro , Submicro and Symbolic Representations and the Relationship Between Them : Key Models in Chemical Education. Models and Modelling in Science Education, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8

Haas, D. B., Watts, F. M., Dood, A. J., & Shultz, G. V. (2024). Analysis of organic chemistry students’ developing reasoning elicited by a scaffolded case comparison activity. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4rp00021h

Harle, M., & Towns, M. (2011). A review of spatial ability literature, its connection to chemistry, and implications for instruction. In Journal of Chemical Education (Vol. 88, Issue 3, pp. 351–360). https://doi.org/10.1021/ed900003n

Holme, T. A. (2023). A Snapshot of Organic Chemistry Instruction and Curriculum over the Past 100 Years. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(6), 2093–2095. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00467

Hutchison, J. M. (2017). Improving Translational Accuracy between Dash–Wedge Diagrams and Newman Projections. Journal of Chemical Education, 94, 892–896. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JCHEMED.6B00720

Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(9), 701–705.

Kenia, D., & Uyun, M. (2023). Islamic Religiosity and Perceived Behavioral Control on Academic Cheating. International Journal of Islamic Educational Psychology, 4(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijiep.v4i1.17743

Kolomuç, A., & Tekin, S. (2011). Chemistry Teachers ’ Misconceptions Concerning Concept of Chemical Reaction Rate. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(2), 84–101.

Lopes, L. E., Frank, E. T., Kárpáti, Z., Schmitt, T., & Kronauer, D. J. C. (2023). The Alarm Pheromone and Alarm Response of the Clonal Raider Ant. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 49(1–2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-023-01407-4

Malanchini, M., Rimfeld, K., Shakeshaft, N. G., McMillan, A., Schofield, K. L., Rodic, M., Rossi, V., Kovas, Y., Dale, P. S., Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Plomin, R. (2020). Evidence for a unitary structure of spatial cognition beyond general intelligence. Npj Science of Learning, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-0067-8

Malik, A., & Barizi, A. (2022). The Islamic Perspective on Trilogy Epistemology : Bay ā ni , Burh ā ni , and ‘ Irf ā ni. Tajdid, 29(1), 83–104.

Mayer, R. E. (2024). The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2022). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (Third Edit). Cambridge University Press (CUP).

Mukwambo, M., Nzwala, K., & Maemeko, E. (2023). The Teaching of Scientific Literacy in Disadvantaged Communities. 8(4), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v8i4.1401

Nierhaus, T., Wesolek, S., Pach, D., Witt, C. M., Blankenburg, F., & Schmidt, T. T. (2023). Content Representation of Tactile Mental Imagery in Primary Somatosensory Cortex. ENeuro, 10(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-22.2023

Nkosi, T., & Mnguni, L. (2020). The impact of physical molecular models on students’ visuo-semiotic reasoning skills related to the lewis structure and ball & stick model of ammonia. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(4), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.594

O’Dwyer, A., & Childs, P. E. (2017). Who says organic chemistry is difficult? Exploring perspectives and perceptions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3599–3620. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00748a

Qian, Y., Wang, Y., Wen, J., Wu, S., & Zhang, J. (2023). One Hundred Core Concepts In Chemistry And Upper-Secondary School Teachers’ And Students’ Chemistry Conceptual Structures. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(3), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.493

Ramadhan, B. (2022). The Religiosity as Mediator between Academic Motivation and Materialism of Minangkabau University Students in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism, 3(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesm-2022-0015

Rockenbach, L. C., Raupp, D. T., & De Andrade Neto, A. S. (2024). Meaningful learning of stereochemistry using medicinal plants as contextualization through a virtual learning environment platform. ACTIO: Docência Em Ciências, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3895/actio.v9n1.17081

Salame, I. I., & Kabir, S. A. (2022a). Examining Students’ Spatial Ability and Its Impact on the Learning of Stereochemistry. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2288. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12099

Salame, I. I., & Kabir, S. A. (2022b). Examining Students’ Spatial Ability and Its Impact on the Learning of Stereochemistry. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2288. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12099

Setyawan, S. (2022). Esensi Perbedaan Redaksi Perintah Membaca Dalam Al-Qur’an. Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 7(01), 45. https://doi.org/10.30868/at.v7i01.2343

Stieff, M., Scopelitis, S., Lira, M. E., & Desutter, D. (2016). Improving Representational Competence with Concrete Models. Science Education, 100(2), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21203

Sumin, S., Retnawati, H., & Sayadi, W. (2023). Development and Validation of the Islamic Work Exemplary Scale in Indonesia. Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal, 6(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.25217/0020236392000

Swamy, N. K. L., Chavan, P. S., & Murthy, S. (2018). StereoChem: Augmented reality 3d molecular model visualization app for teaching and learning stereochemistry. Proceedings - IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2018, 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2018.00065

Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro , Submicro , and Symbolic : The many faces of the chemistry “ triplet .” International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903386435

Taufik, N., Sultan, U., & Idrissamarinda, A. M. (2023). Inovasi Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Dalam Perspektif Kurikulum Humanistik. Atthiflah: Journal of Early Childhood Islamic Education, 10(2), 230–238.

Thomas, D. C., Frambach, J. M., Teunissen, P. W., Smeenk, F. W. J. M., & Torre, D. (2025). Enhancing Learning in Outpatient Care Training: Theory Can Inform the Practice of Graduate Medical Education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 14(1), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.5334/PME.1576

Torrance, E. P., & Torrance, J. P. (1973). Is Creativity Teachable? Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

Zahoor, I., & Khan, S. N. (2023). Contemplative Practices of Higher Education Faculty of Pakistan: Applications and Propositions. International Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Learning (IJITL), 8(2), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.35993/ijitl.v8i2.2461

Zumrah, A. R., Khalid, M. Y., Ali, K., & Mokhtar, A. N. (2020). The effect of religiosity on trainees’ reaction and motivation to transfer: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2017-0109

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Fibonacci, A., Kadarohman , A. ., Hernani , H. ., Roslan , R. ., & Drastisianti , A. . (2025). Mapping Chemistry Learning Barriers in the Context of Islamic Higher Education: Insights from Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers. Journal of Learning Improvement and Lesson Study, 5(2), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.24036/jlils.v5i2.171